Archive for the ‘technology’ Category

on email spam…

Wednesday, April 11th, 2007

in most cases, i find that i am much more effective than a spam detector in figuring out what's spam and what's not just by looking at the subject line (and, in extreme cases, at the sender as well). in very few cases does one have to open the email to be sure.

recently, i got this email (twice) on my y! mail account (which, by the way, will soon offer unlimited email storage). i wasn't totally sure by just looking at the subject and sender (although the last name was pretty fake), so i opened it - i was pretty surprised at a few things in the email (a spin-off of the classic "millionaire bank account" email).

My dearest Ahmed,

May Allah bless and guide you and family for me!

I am highly compelled upon strict recommendation, to write you this very urgent and confidential letter. I do hope my letter will not embarrass you since I had no previous correspondence with you. It is because of my deepest faith in Alla and also in you as a true Islamic sibling made me stood firm to write you this email. I have been tormented, tortured, maltreated and humiliated along side with my kids for no just reason.

wow... a "true" greeting, and a prayer too... could be convincing if one didn't know better. secondly, the leaving out of an h in "Allah" in the first paragraph... third, the playing on emotions (because you're my "Islamic sibling" - we as muslims do consider each other brothers and sisters). interesting.

I want you to assist me acquiring and safe keeping my only remaining inheritance from a security company in London. I will send you detail of my investment plans in my next correspondence to you. I solely want to invest this money in your country with all legal backs. We are suffering under the leadership of the bad government and this is why I want to run away from my country to settle in your country for high security reasons.

so... what country is "your country" - but the typical reader may not notice.

I am sending this proposal with a broken heart and I believe that you are going to give me a sympathetic attention. I regret the inconvenience it might cause you based on the condition that we have not met before. But I so much believe that Allah is in total control.

hmm, making people sympathize and mentioning, "Allah is in total control."

Intro:

I am Hajia . Munirat Fatima Abacha, the wife of Mohammed Abacha, son of the late head of state of Federal Republic of Nigeria - General Sani Abacha.I am contacting you in view of the fact that we will be of great assistance to each other like wise developing a cordial relationship as true Islamic families.

My husband along with his late father and top officials of their past administration has been accused of looting several Billion United States Dollars from the Nigeria Government. The current attitude of the present government towards my family has indeed made life quite unbearable and sad to us trying to leave us on empty handed. Make reference to this BBC report: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/2282366.stm

hey, now i have proof that her husband really did have this case, including a bbc report...

for us. Fortunately, Mohammed my Husband has Eighteen million and Six hundred thousand and United States Dollars (US$18.6 million) cash, which he intended to use for investment purposes in an Islamic nation abroad for hotel and recreation reservation centre, while part will be diverted into charity and destitute homes to assist the life of the needy and helpless. This money is kept in a private security company in London now. This money was deposited for safe keeping in the security vault of a freighting agency here by my husband preparatory to being air lifted abroad for investment purposes before his arrest leaving a clause that it could only be claimed by an expatriate partner. It is only my husband and myself that know where the money is kept with full information on documents with our trusted family lawyer.

what's this "for us" that starts the paragraph? - there's nothing missing above it or below it... it doesn't make any sense to start that sentence with "for us," but uh... okay. centre? confidential information like this sent in an email? using stolen money for charity? yeah...

Due to the current situation in the country concerning government’s vendettas towards my family, we seek your assistance to transfer this money out of London for the purpose of investment as intended by my husband. Note that my family is currently being probed by this present government for alleged involvement in misappropriation of public funds during my father-in-law's regime. Towards this effect, an embargo restricting my family members from traveling or carrying out financial transactions without their express permission is in force.

Right now, my husband (Mohammed) is under arrest and is being detained in connection to the above and other activities of his late father. However, I have an arrangement on how to freight this money to you after receiving some assurances from you of the safety our own share and that you will only take the commission that we will offer you. This money personally belongs to my husband and he intends that it still be used for investment in Islamic nations only.

investing in islamic nations? don't they realize that this money, which they admit is stolen and provide an article from the bbc proving it, is 7aram (unlawful) and unusable for investment in islamic countries and islamic projects?

The freighting company to be used has now been introduced to me and as soon as we receive your readiness to assist us receives this fund we shall formalize the deposit documents in your name and reach an agreement with them to air lift the consignment for your pick up in your address. Bearing in mind that your assistance is needed to transfer this fund, wepropose a commission of 15% (Fifteen Percent) of the total sum to you for the expected services and assistance. While extra 5% is mapped out for miscellaneous expenses.

heyyy! 15% cut of stolen money... no thank you!

On your positive consent, I shall expect you to contact me urgently to enable us discuss about this. Your urgent response is highly needed. I must use this opportunity to implore you to exercise utmost indulgence to keep this matter extraordinarily confidential, while I await your prompt response. I have to remind you that this information should be on a top confidential level. Best regards,

if it has to be kept confidential, its probably illegal... but do people realize this?

MRS. MUNIRAT FATIMA ABACHA

PROFILE: <http://profiles.yahoo.com/hajiafatimaabacha>

so a few interesting things... check out her profile on yahoo (link above). not very realistic that someone in royalty will set up a yahoo profile and set their homepage to be a link to a bbc article accusing their husband of stealing money from the government...

the problem is, with such types of "realistic" and "targeted" messages, many people (especially from the uncle/auntie generation and the non computer savvy people) may believe such messages, especially when they're addressed as personally as these messages are and when they try to pull people's help for a "humanitarian cause" and for "the sake of religion" and "doing what's right" while at the same time presenting a partially accurate (albeit disconnected) view reflective of the recipient's beliefs.

*update (4/13/2007)* - this morning, i got two new versions of this email. one to y! mail that is very similar to the other one except with an email address included, and another on gmail which is a different version that includes 1. a new url for the news url (link to cnn this time), 2. a phone number, 3. a "please email me here for security and privacy" with a link to a yahoo.fr email account (except with horrible spelling). 4. a different last name, 5. different percentage (50% rather than 15%), 6. addressing me as "my mr. ahmed" and "dear"...

this is totally ludicrous...

popping a subset of gmail messages…

Sunday, January 28th, 2007

so i usually always pop my gmail mail, especially after i heard the paranoia about how google was closing accounts at random and people were losing insane amounts of email. but recently, i suffered a hard drive reformat (courtesy of windows, which attempted to format my entire hard drive rather than a partition because my hard drive was over 160 gb and win2k can't read more than that, so it named the drive corrupt), i only had email up through the 4th of january popped from my gmail account.

however, i couldn't find an easy way to pop the email that i had lost between january 4th to today. i tried many things - i tried resetting the pop option to allow downloading of already downloaded mail in the settings, and this worked for some subset of messages and eventually ceased to work (i got ~1100 messages the first time, ~400 the second time, then ~200, and so on, but eventually it stopped getting new ones).

finally, i found a solution - first, delete anything in your deleted folder. then, select all the messages you already have (for me, anything older than 1/4/2007) by doing a search for "before: 2007/1/4" (not sure if this only works for inbox and sent or whether it also searches the archived mail, but you can just use "show search options" and search for messages that way too just to be sure). take these messages and delete them. then goto settings, and under forwarding & pop, set gmail to download messages that have already been downloaded. now goto your email client, hit download, and you should get just the subset of messages that you didn't trash.

you can then goto the trash can, select all conversations and move them to inbox (be careful, don't accidentally empty the trash!) now this will cause a problem - you'll find your chats and your sent mail that has no replies to it also in your inbox (which frustrated me). the solution? goto the inbox, do a search for label:chat - select all the messages and hit archive. then go back to the inbox, do a search for messages from: me, and mark all those as archived. then go back to the inbox one more time, do a search across all mail (including archived mail) for messages to: me, and hit "move to inbox."

and that should do it!

64 bits!

Monday, January 8th, 2007

after much trouble to get things to install, my home machine is now up and running with gentoo 64!

amazing…

Monday, December 11th, 2006

according to this article, the average person spends 17.12 years of their life watching tv. amazing... (yes, yes, i know - i spend at least double that in front of a computer :p)

over 1k bookmarks

Wednesday, November 1st, 2006

my del.icio.us account (and hence my myweb2 account) has reached over 1000 bookmarks... like whoa.

islamic advice from sheikh google

Tuesday, October 31st, 2006

i saw this yesterday when i clicked on the gmail tab to read some new mail. click the image for a readable version of it.
google islamic rss feed text

and no, i haven't custom added any rss feeds to gmail... it means, "know Allah's marvelous/magnificent plan for your life..." thanks google!

discovering non whats the plot plots…

Sunday, October 1st, 2006

(translated into normal english, the title would read, "discovering the things that have happened and/or the news in places other than this weblog").

so for the longest time, i've been using bloglines... a while back, i gave google reader a shot, but it was totally unusable. finally, a few days back, they released a new, much nicer version. so much so that i would say i easily prefer it to bloglines... the new google reader solves the main issue i have with bloglines - that once you've read the feeds, you can't ever see them again and they're gone forever. it also adds some nice new features (starring, and the public watchlist are really neat features). and the new ui is awesome...

so far, i only have two complaints about the new reader - first, it doesn't refresh automatically (or does so after a very long time). this isn't a big deal because there are firefox extensions to do this kind of thing. the second is a bit more problematic - the default refresh values for feeds seems to be way too long to me. this is fine for 99% of sites because they typically are not updated that frequently. however, for watching something like the fatwallet deals forum, the default rate doesn't seem to cut it (bloglines also has some default, but i never really "noticed" it with fatwallet for example, whereas i found myself often wondering, "wait, no new deal postings?" while using google reader - which may also mean that bloglines also has this problem, i haven't really done any real testing on this). recently, i've also subscribed to the del.icio.us hotlist and y! top news, which change pretty often.

so my solution to this problem is to handle those types of feeds with a combination of netvibes and my desktop rss reader (so if i miss them while i am at work during the day, i can see them when i go home). so for the time being, i'll probably try to stick to using google reader. if you're still using bloglines and haven't tried google reader yet, i suggest you export your feeds from it and give google reader a try. even though there is no perfect rss web based reader yet, maybe one day there will be :)

a neat tip for gmailers

Wednesday, September 6th, 2006

this is a priceless tip that could prove useful to some of the gmail users out there...

about the facebook feeds…

Tuesday, September 5th, 2006

today, the facebook "gets a facelift," in which they add feeds and such. here's a screenshot.

facebook redesign

so as you can see from the screenshot above, it basically gives you detailed information about almost everything that all your friends are doing - you know when someone has added a friend, joined a group, left a group, changed his or her status or profile, and so on.

while facebook was never really that private (any of your friends could look and see these changes if they wanted to, but it would take time and effort), i think that this will cause me to be a bit more cautious about what i change and when i write on people's walls and so on. in some ways, i can see how this may increase interaction (if you're just logging on real quick to check messages, you may see a friend's update that may cause you to react in some way (post a message, etc), which you otherwise may not have seen), but at the same time, i can see how it would cause people to be cautious.

it is interesting to see the reaction of people to these changes - i think the screenshot above suffices in explaining what i am trying to say...

*update* - check out mark zuckerberg's reply to all the negative feedback on the facebook. check it out here on the facebook blog.

google encourages people to swim…

Monday, September 4th, 2006

i found this picture the other day... pretty funny, the poor guy has to swim to get to his destination.